Sunday, 22 May 2011

Black and Yellow

A colleague of mine (one Jenny Brooks, a.k.a Camp Mum) recently updated her blog with an informative report on scale insects, and their place in New Zealand Ecosystems. This has influenced my blog update this week, in which I present the effects of introduced insect species on Scale insects in New Zealand beech forests.

Firstly, I have a bit of background information for you. Scale insects (Ultracoelostoma assimile) are commonly found in Nothofagus forests across New Zealand. Female individuals bury their heads into tree trunks and branches, and process tree sap. A by-product of this sap consumption is the production of honeydew, which is then excreted by the insect via a long anal tube! (Figure 1.0 below)

Figure 1.0 - This picture shows the side of a Nothofagus beech tree. The white thread like structures are the anal tubes of the scale insects, the tip of which contains a droplet of honeydew. Note the mould on the tree trunk, which feeds of the sugars provided by the honeydew.

The honeydew produced by scale insects has an important place in New Zealand ecosystems. It is an important food source for various fungi and other insects. Also, it is a common source of nectar for many native birds such as Tui and Bellbirds.

Unfortunately all of this is under threat due to the effect of invasive insects. The bad guys in this case are the Common Wasp (Vespula vulgaris) and the German Wasp (Vespula germanica) (Figure 2.0 below). These species (introduced in 1978 and 1945 respectively), have been suspected of altering communties across the country, especially in beech forests.
Figure 2.0 - Spot the Difference! Common Wasp on the left, German Wasp on the right.

The main concern with these wasp species is that they have adapted a way of consuming far more than their fair share of honeydew. There are plenty of native wasps that also consume honeydew from scale insects, without causing such damage to ecosystems. "Why are Common and German Wasps such a problem then Tom?", I hear you asking. Well kids, this is why.
Both Vespula vulgaris and Vespula germanica have discovered that they can get a far more concentrated shot of sugar by chewing off the anal tube that stems the flow of honeydew. By consuming the sugary secretions in this manor, wasps can reduce the amount of honeydew that is available for nectar feeding birds and insects. Any honeydew that is not consumed by the wasp cannot be contained by the scale insect, so a lot of nutrients is lost to the forest floor.

A paper titled "Effect of introduced social wasps on the standing crop of honeydew in New Zealand beech forests" investigated what effect introduced wasps were having on the availability of honeydew for native animals. Their experiments looked at the sugar quality of trees exposed to wasp populations, and compared them with those excluded from wasp populations. Their results show that the presence of introduced wasps reduces the energy level of the honeydew by 99.1%, 98.4%, and 91.3% in January, March, and May, respectively. They concluded that this reduction in the nutrient content of the honeydew may be responsible for the significantly lower number of native birds in areas with heavy wasp populations. They finished by stating that the removal of honeydew by introduced wasp species is threatening the existence of some native animals.

All though the problems introduced wasp species are causing in native beech forests does not demand a lot of media attention, their evident spread across New Zealand makes control options limited. Eradication is an unlikely situation, and control efforts should be aimed at reducing numbers enough to allow bird and insect diversity to copete with the wasps.

This is just one example of how invasive insect species are impacting on New Zealand ecosystems. Although the wasps do not kill the scale insects, their actions create a chain of effects which are potentially damaging to whole communities.

It seems that everyone knows about the seriousness of vertebrate pests in New Zealand (possums vector tb, stoats kill native birds, rabbits degrade farmland etc. etc.). What I want to know is, why do you think invertebrate pests receive significantly less attention and smaller budgets for control options? Personally I think it has to do with the lack of visible economic cost that can be associated with issues surrounding invertebrate pests such as introduced wasp species. What are your thoughts?

Cheers guys, cya next time.

Effect of introduced social wasps on the standing crop of honeydew in New Zealand beech forests. Moller, H., Tilley, JAV., Thomas, BW., Gaze, PD
New Zealand Journal of Zoology, Vol. 18, pp. 171-179. 1991.

The prevalence of introduced Vespula vulgaris wasps in a New Zealand beech forest community
Thomas, C.D., Moller, H., Plunkett, G.M., Harris, R.J.
New Zealand Journal of Ecology, vol. 13. 1990.

Tuesday, 10 May 2011

Invading Hell on Earth

Timber transported to Antarctica: a potential and undesirable carrier for alien fungi and insects
-           Piotr Osyczka
-           Piotr Mleczko
-          Dariusz Karasin´ ski
-          Andrzej Chlebicki
I’ll be honest, the majority of scientific papers on invasive insects are not exactly riveting reads. However, I found this wee gem after about an hour’s research. It focuses on the possibility of insect (along with other alien species) invasion in Antarctica of all places. I know, I know, you are now thinking; “how on earth can foreign insects invade, establish and be a cause for concern in such a desert wasteland?” I thought this exact same thing, so I decided to investigate further.
The paper begins by describing the harsh environment that we all know Antarctica to be. Isolation and climate are both reasons used to describe the low diversity of insects and other invertebrates. The authors describe how the climate of Antarctica is slowly becoming more favourable to invertebrates. It is also becoming less and less isolated. Increases in human activity are meaning there are greater chances for insect invasion. Freight and cargo are possible vectors for insect introductions, and human activities such as research and tourism means that there are chances for insects to move around.
In my opinion, Antarctica and New Zealand share similarly orientated ecosystems. Both are extremely unique and diverse, have high endemism rates, and have been shaped by years of isolation and varying climates. We have all seen and heard about the impacts invasive species have had on New Zealand’s fragile ecosystems, so I believe that Antarctica should be treated with a similar level of concern.
 The authors of this paper describe how these changes to land use on Antarctica are slowly increasing the biodiversity of a once marginalised environment, and that this does not necessarily bode well for the future. As discussed in the article, one of the main problems concerning invasions is the need to introduce building materials. Obviously wood production on Antarctica is very meager, so all supplies must be brought in from offshore. If the wood is untreated, there is a potential for it to house alien species.
This paper specifically focuses on an inspection of wood destined for Arctowski Station. The shipment of timber was screened, before all insect larvae or adults were filtered out and placed in 70% ethanol. All specimens were identified using appropriate methods, and the results were published. Even in the relatively small shipment of wood, two insect species (along with various fungi species) were discovered.
It was concluded that the niches of insects found within the timber were reliant on a reasonable supply of bark. Because Antarctica lacks any real woody flora, the possibility for invasions by insects of this kind is unlikely. In saying this, the authors mention how important it is to take extreme care when transporting materials to a foreign port. Regions with fragile ecosystems, such as New Zealand and Antarctica, cannot afford the invasion of alien insect species.

I guess a large issue contained within this paper is the idea that increases in human activity and global movements mean there are greater opportunities for insect invasions. One thing I would love to hear you opinion on is whether you think invasions will continue to increase with increasing human traffic, or whether you think our management practices and border security can improve to limit successful invasions by insect species?